Skip to content

BART… and you’re where?

September 21, 2014
The BART Silicon Valley alignment as currently proposed. Source: VTA

The BART Silicon Valley alignment as currently proposed. Source: VTA

As the Berryessa BART extension progresses, VTA leadership, elected officials, and the SVLG are beginning to prepare for the monumental political and economic hurdles for completing the second phase of the project to Downtown San Jose and Santa Clara.

The multibillion dollar project involves expensive tunneling beneath Downtown San Jose and will ultimately terminate at the Santa Clara Caltrain station. Despite questionable ridership estimates, the project continues to enjoy political and public support and VTA intends to advance planning and pursue funding to complete the project.

Barring a shift in public opinion, the extension through Downtown San Jose will likely be constructed, but there’s still an opportunity to reconsider the merits of terminating the line at the Santa Clara Caltrain station. Instead, alternatives should be evaluated that serve more people and provides greater regional transit connectivity to a part of the Santa Clara Valley that has none, but is targeted for future growth– the West San Carlos, Bascom, and Winchester corridors.

Santa Clara Stumbles

The Santa Clara Caltrain station is one of the oldest railroad stations on the west coast, and once served the adjacent town and agricultural industry, which sprouted around the nearby mission. However, in an audacious stroke of force driven by the prevailing post war planning philosophy, the entire downtown commercial area was demolished and replaced with a handful of strip malls, garden apartments, and surface parking lots.

New office development adjacent to Santa Clara Caltrain station. Tucked behind the blue office cubes are 4,000 parking stalls.

New office development adjacent to Santa Clara Caltrain station. Tucked behind the blue office cubes are 4,000 parking stalls. Source: Hunter/Storm

Recent planning efforts promote concentrated mixed-use development adjacent to the Santa Clara station, but little progress has been made that breaks from the ubiquitous Silicon Valley parking lot, strip mall, and office park. A new stadium for the local Major League Soccer team is nearing completion, but it’s flanked by surface parking lots and a new 1.5 million square foot office park known as the “high line.” The promotional video for the project declares the traditional office park a “true urban destination” despite its sprawling site plan arranged primarily around parking structures with 4,000 parking stalls.

Design faults of recent development notwithstanding, one could argue that terminating BART at Santa Clara Caltrain is warranted because of multimodal connectivity– multiple frequent bus lines serve the station including VTA’s heavily used El Camino Real service and the bus connection to the San Jose International Airport. Some plans call for an automated people mover to replace the bus connection, but at roughly $750,000,000 for several miles of track, it’s a poor investment. As discussed in the new Diridon Area plan, San Jose Diridon is better suited for an airport connector, whether bus or rail, due to its greater number of trains, buses, and future high speed rail stop.

 

The alternative alignment would provide regional transit connections to existing and future development nodes.

The alternative alignment would provide regional transit connections to existing and future development nodes.

A New Alignment

Rather than turning north towards the Santa Clara Caltrain station, the line could veer south with a potential stop at Race Street & San Carlos. Then, utilizing the inherent advantages of tunneling, the line could turn and serve San Jose City College and the Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, with a combined employment and enrollment of nearly 15,000 people. Finally, the line would terminate at Winchester & San Carlos adjacent to Valley Fair and Santana Row.

With stops at these locations, the alignment would connect with 5 frequent VTA bus routes that all have robust ridership and serve additional destinations along the Winchester, Bascom, and San Carlos corridors. A BART alignment serving these streets would further complement San Jose’s General Plan 2040 land use vision, which focuses mixed use, high density infill development on these streets. The manifestation of this vision would result in roughly 10,000 new housing units and 11,000 new jobs within these areas, according to the city’s General Plan land use data table.

Planned growth areas for the City of San Jose showing focused areas near the revised BART alignment.

Planned growth areas for the City of San Jose showing focused areas in the western are of the city, near the reoriented BART alignment. Source City of San Jose

While the cost of this alternative will likely be higher due to an extra 1.5 miles of subway, and additional stations, ridership may be more robust due to better connectivity with existing frequent transit service, proximity to existing regional destinations, and future development patterns shaped by San Jose’s General Plan.

Santa Clara city officials may also have reservations about any change in the alignment if its perceived as damaging to city interests or civic pride. However, the city will have more robust Caltrain service following the electrification project, which will transform Caltrain into a true regional rapid transit system with faster and more frequent service– further blurring the line between BART and Caltrain. The incorporated area of Santa Clara also extends through a portion of Valley Fair and encompasses half of Stevens Creek Boulevard beginning roughly at Winchester, which means the city would actually have two regional rapid transit lines serving different ares of the city and two local rapid transit lines– El Camino Real BRT and the Tasman West light rail line.

The concept of a horseshoe-shaped South Bay BART alignment is an enduring remnant from the earliest BART plans, likely driven by the assumption that Peninsula rail service would be replaced by BART. Given present-day emission reduction targets, land use plans, and transit productivity goals, the 60 year old transit vision should be reexamined for compatibility with the needs of today and tomorrow.

Advertisements
6 Comments leave one →
  1. Robert Bowdidge permalink
    October 5, 2014 4:25 am

    Great idea – Santana Row and Race St/Uptown are both becoming dense, and BART access would help them become more than just huge apartment buildings with auto congestion.

    • October 6, 2014 5:47 am

      Thanks Robert! That’s what I was aiming for. It may turn out to be a complete bust, but I hope VTA et al will crunch the housing/job numbers and account for land use changes when doing the alternatives analysis.

  2. orulz permalink
    October 8, 2014 3:21 pm

    My initial thought was to just go straight to Valley Fair / Santana Row as a subway with a single station. But I do like the idea of catching the Medical Center as well. But three new stations, all undeground? That would blow the budget in a huge way.

    So, why does it have to be a subway. Come to the surface ASAP after Diridon and then elevate it over the 280. Probably skip the station at Race which would probably have to be underground. That would blow the budget. There is a VTA light rail station there already which isn’t perfect but is better than nothing.

    • October 10, 2014 7:01 am

      Agreed that it would probably be pricey. There’s a lot of redevelopment potential near Race and there are transfer opportunities to the 23, future San Carlos BRT, 63, and 65 so I was thinking it may just be worthwhile. VTA light rail does not have a convenient connection to the 23/San Carlos BRT except for downtown, which can be quite a detour if you need to transfer. Furthermore, I wanted to try and think of BART a little more as a regional metro with tighter stop spacing and strong connections to as many frequent bus lines as possible. With high speeds and frequent, reliable service, BART coupled with the local bus lines would really start to make more transit trips feasible.

      Also agree that elevated would make a lot of sense along 280; it could also thread the 280-17-880 interchanges rather than going underground to further reduce cost, but there would be more curves.

  3. Joe Brant permalink
    March 8, 2015 10:25 am

    This sounds like a great idea! But how would a powerless citizen like me push this to VTA or BART?

    • March 10, 2015 4:59 am

      Joe- thanks! Please, send an e-mail to the VTA Board of Directors and the San Jose City council telling them that you believe VTA should explore additional alignment options for the phase II BART extension that are aligned with the region’s land use, transportation, and environmental goals. Or, maybe just tell them that you’d be more interested in riding BART to somewhere other than the Santa Clara Caltrain station since we can get there via rail already. Feel free to link to, quote, or use any of my images from this article if you’d like.

      Either way, your comment is very important since VTA and other city officials are beginning to critically reevaluate the merits of building to the Santa Clara Caltrain station and any voices from the public that support this end are essential.

      The VTA Board of Directors is here: http://www.vta.org/get-involved/board-of-directors

      San Jose City Council is here: http://www.sanjoseca.gov/index.aspx?NID=1187

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: